Change requests to the table document -- pass them to me please!

Mark Davis ⌛ mark at macchiato.com
Fri Jul 17 21:59:14 CEST 2009


I will have to run it through my tests (which will take a bit of a change to
the code), but I don't anticipate any problems.

Mark


On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:59, Kenneth Whistler <kenw at sybase.com> wrote:

> Patrik asked awhile ago:
>
> > I can say that the introduction of 5.2 give _zero_ changes needed to
> > the exclusion lists. I "just" run my software on the 5.2 versions of
> > the Unicode data.
> >
> > Mark, others, can you please verify this?
>
> I didn't see anyone else respond, so yes, I think we can verify
> that nothing that was added or changed in Unicode 5.2 should
> have had any impact whatsoever on the stability of the exclusion
> lists.
>
> --Ken
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090717/8056b274/attachment.htm 


More information about the Idna-update mailing list