U+07FA, NKO LAJANYALAN (was Re: consensus on TATWEEL)

[Mark Davis ⌛]

Yes, it should be DISALLOWED.

Mark


On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:22, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com> wrote:

> On 16 Jul 2009, at 08:27, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>
> > On 15 jul 2009, at 00.56, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> >
> > I have not seen any explicit consensus that U+07FA NKO LAJANYALAN
> > should be DISALLOWED, but maybe I am misunderstanding the earlier
> > discussions about TATWEEL.
> >
> > Is the consensus of the group that U+07FA NKO LAJANYALAN should be
> > DISALLOWED as an exception?
>
> It is 100% as meaningless as a character and as dangerous in an IDN
> context as TATWEEL. Yes, it should be DISALLOWED.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090716/1075f51d/attachment-0001.htm