U+07FA, NKO LAJANYALAN (was Re: consensus on TATWEEL)

[Patrik Fältström]

On 15 jul 2009, at 00.56, Kenneth Whistler wrote:

> The issue is about explicitly disallowing U+0640 ARABIC TATWEEL
> and U+07FA NKO LAJANYALAN, which are gc=Lm, and which
> are still classed as PVALID in idnabis-tables-05.txt.
> (But which, when we discussed this last, we had consensus
> should be DISALLOWED, instead.)

I have not seen any explicit consensus that U+07FA NKO LAJANYALAN  
should be DISALLOWED, but maybe I am misunderstanding the earlier  
discussions about TATWEEL.

Is the consensus of the group that U+07FA NKO LAJANYALAN should be  
DISALLOWED as an exception?

(It is today PVALID...)

    Patrik

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090716/31cb974e/attachment.pgp