mappings-01 and the general procedure

[Vint Cerf]

I cannot think of any reason to depart from the IDNA2003 sequence;  
perhaps others with more
expertise may weigh in with their opinions.

v

On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Erik van der Poel wrote:

> At first glance, it doesn't seem to matter whether you lower-case
> first, or map wide and narrow characters first. Both orders achieve
> the same result (I believe).
>
> However, just to be a bit more similar to IDNA2003, I was suggesting
> adopting the same order. Is there any real need to be different from
> IDNA2003 in this one respect?
>
> Erik
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Pete Resnick<presnick at qualcomm.com>  
> wrote:
>> On 7/12/09 at 4:47 PM -0700, Erik van der Poel wrote:
>>
>>> The order of the steps in the mappings draft should probably be
>>> lower-casing, wide/narrow mapping, then NFC.
>>
>> So, why doesn't wide/narrow come first? That makes more sense to me.
>>
>> pr
>> --
>> Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
>> Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax:  
>> (858)651-1102
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update