mappings-01 and the general procedure

[Paul Hoffman]

At 9:37 AM -0700 7/12/09, Erik van der Poel wrote:
>Although mappings-01 clearly states that "an appliction[sp] might want
>to implement" mappings that are more compatible with IDNA2003 instead,
>I wonder whether implementors will figure out that the order of the
>above steps is somewhat different from that of IDNA2003, and that some
>strings would be mapped differently.

I'm not sure how to say that better than "instead". Suggested wording?