John C Klensin wrote: > ... we > would ban "w" in favor of "uu" or "vv", might ban "u" in favor > of "v" ... Clearly the correct form is a "u" positioned above, and joining, an "o", the Wabenaki solution to the problem presented by 16th century French lacking the requisite character. If you'll all turn your Unicode hymn books to U+0222 and U+0223 ...