I-D Action:draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings-00.txt

[Eric Brunner-Williams]

Any phrasing is possible. Some mean less than others. One of my 
co-workers was tempted to use "entropy" in a policy document recently. I 
prefer not to use the word unless the "entropy" asserted to exist can be 
stated as a mathematical formula. If you could make that attempt, it 
would be helpful. Users deserve statements that purport to "explain" 
which are factually correct.

Eric

Elisabeth Blanconil wrote:
> 2009/6/30 "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp 
> <mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>>
>
>     A case mapping is also a 'loss of information', but one that
>     people clearly want.
>
>
> Could we not phrase this differently ? Case mapping may be considered 
> only if it does not represent a loss of information. Otherwise should 
> we not name it "case and entropy mapping" to explain users where 
> entropy occurs.
>
> Elisabeth Blanconil
>
>
>
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>