Another Transition Plan Proposal

John C Klensin klensin at
Sat Dec 12 04:59:57 CET 2009

--On Friday, December 11, 2009 22:37 -0500 Andrew Sullivan
<ajs at> wrote:

> On 2009-12-11, at 19:45, John C Klensin <klensin at>
> wrote:
>> Procedural question, just out of curiosity and independent of
>> other issues.   A BCP like the one you describe would require
>> either a significant charter revision (to add the task) or a
>> new WG.
> Why isn't this work covered by the charter item
>      - Ensure practical stability of validity algorithms for
> IDNs.
> ?

Even if one made that particular stretch (IMO), the question
remains whether the WG is prepared to hold the other documents
until such time as we have consensus on a BCP in this area.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list