[OT] trademarks (was: Re: Bundling)
Mark Davis ☕
mark at macchiato.com
Fri Dec 11 17:46:17 CET 2009
Well, my authority for this information *is* an expert in trademark law, a
past president of the International Trademark Association (INTA). Full
disclosure: she's also my wife, so I pretty much have to go by what she says
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 02:14, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>wrote:
> Hello Mark,
> Thanks for the very interesting data.
> On 2009/12/08 6:51, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
>> Interestingly, I have it on good authority that in terms of trademarks,
>> eszett and ss are treated the same -- that is, in trademark lingo, a
>> that only differed by exchanging these characters from a trademark would
>> infringe that trademark.
> I'm in no way a lawyer, and not at all an expert in trademark law. But
> assume there was a village with two traditional bakeries, one called
> Bäckerei Boss and another Bäckerei Boß. It's very well possible that they
> both would get their trademarks protected, based on the fact that everybody
> in the village knew they were different. That would be different if one was
> well-established, and the other was a newcomer, which is I guess the case
> you are referring to.
> On the other hand, if somebody tried to open a hamburger chain and call it
> Wendys or Wendy or Wendi's or some such, it's highly likely that Wendy's
> would successfully claim a violation of their trademark, based on the fact
> that it's easy to confuse these, and that "Wendy's" is already well
> Lawyers are not computer scientists, and law doesn't work like computers,
> but tries (many times not very well) to adjust to people's varying
> Regards, Martin.
> #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
> #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Idna-update