AW: Sharp-S and Final Sigma Consensus Call Results
vint at google.com
Wed Dec 9 21:55:48 CET 2009
wouldn't mapping of pvalid chars would disrupt the A-Label/U-label
If that isn't implicit in the protocol or at least rationale documents
perhaps it should be?
On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
>>> I am supporting PVALID for both Sharp-S and Final Sigma, given that
>>> mapping of PVALID characters is disallowed.
>> Mapping of PVALID characters is *not* disallowed in
> I understand. An i don't think draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings should be
> place where mapping of PVALID characters should be disallowed - it's
> Informational document.
> The rule would need to be in one of the Standards Track documents.
More information about the Idna-update