AW: Sharp-S and Final Sigma Consensus Call Results

[Vint Cerf]

wouldn't mapping of pvalid chars would disrupt the A-Label/U-label  
equivalence?
If that isn't implicit in the protocol or at least rationale documents  
perhaps it should be?

vint



On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:

>>> I am supporting PVALID for both Sharp-S and Final Sigma, given that
>>> mapping of PVALID characters is disallowed.
>>
>> Mapping of PVALID characters is *not* disallowed in
>> draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings-05.
>
> I understand. An i don't think draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings should be  
> the
> place where mapping of PVALID characters should be disallowed - it's  
> an
> Informational document.
>
> The rule would need to be in one of the Standards Track documents.
>
> Alex