AW: Mapping?
Debbie Garside
debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Thu Dec 3 17:05:12 CET 2009
Alex wrote:
>>ccTLDs are typically not contractually bound to ICANN.
This is true but somewhere along the line someone is contractually bound to
the domain name holder. If ICANN/IETF issue any directive for the
safety/security/implementation of domain names and the TLD (g or cc) ignores
it, then they are liable to their customers for knowingly selling them a
domain name that MAY not work consistently. I think they would follow any
directive in their own interests.
Best regards
Debbie
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Mayrhofer [mailto:alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at]
Sent: 03 December 2009 16:00
To: debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk; Andrew Sullivan; Georg Ochsner
Cc: Michael Everson; IDNA update work
Subject: RE: AW: Mapping?
> In which case, if ICANN/IETF sent out a directive to registries that
> bundling should occur for a set time period do you think this would a.
> alleviate the problem and b. facilitate ß within
> implementations (including
> certificates)?
ccTLDs are typically not contractually bound to ICANN.
Alex
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.560 / Virus Database: 270.12.26/2116 - Release Date: 15/05/2009
06:16
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.560 / Virus Database: 270.12.26/2116 - Release Date: 15/05/2009
06:16
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list