The real issue: interopability, and a proposal (Was: Consensus Call on Latin Sharp S and Greek Final Sigma)
alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at
Wed Dec 2 11:19:56 CET 2009
> I think that's Mark's point. He was following the previous
> logic and saying that if you can't map PVALID, then you
> shouldn't map DISALLOWED because they could become PVALID.
> Eg: effectively what's happening to eszett.
Ok, i got it - you mean that DISALLOWED characters *could* become PVALID in future revisions of the protocol, and cause similar transition problems like those we experience now.
More information about the Idna-update