Tamil Numerals in IDNA - Re: WG Last Call for Four Primary IDNABIS I-Ds
phoffman at imc.org
Fri Aug 21 05:18:51 CEST 2009
At 10:18 PM -0400 8/20/09, John C Klensin wrote:
>--On Friday, August 21, 2009 12:02 +1000 James Mitchell
><james.mitchell at ausregistry.com.au> wrote:
>> I disagree.
>> This is a result of case-by-case analysis of individual
>> characters. If one does not want the characters in a label
>> then do not allow them during registration.
>James, without taking a position on this, it is not
>"case-by-case analysis of individual characters". It is
>exclusion of a block, albeit a small one.
Is it a "block" defined in Unicode? I don't see it, but I could be missing something.
More information about the Idna-update