WG Last Call for Four Primary IDNABIS I-Ds
ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net
Tue Aug 11 14:22:33 CEST 2009
anything that generates diff noise is strongly depricated. the editor
can sort out template induced artifacts.
Patrik Fältström wrote:
> Thanks for noticing this difference in how the documents are generated
> from the XML that is in use in the IETF.
> The exact order of the sections will be decided upon (and sections
> will potentially be moved around) at the time of publication by the
> RFC Editor while doing other formatting changes.
> I have been in contact with the other document editors, and our
> suggestion to our wg chair is to *NOT* risk destroying the actual
> content of the messages by moving things around at the time of last
> call (both wg and IETF).
> Regards, Patrik
> On 10 aug 2009, at 20.58, Elisabeth Blanconil wrote:
>> Sorry, I meant that section 8 and author came _after_ the appendixes.
>> Elisabeth Blanconil
>> 2009/8/10 Elisabeth Blanconil <eblanconil at gmail.com>:
>>> 1. is it on purpose that section 8 and author come before the
>>> Appendixes? I restored them in the wiki page.
>> Idna-update mailing list
>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
More information about the Idna-update