WG Last Call for Four Primary IDNABIS I-Ds
Eric Brunner-Williams
ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net
Tue Aug 11 14:22:33 CEST 2009
anything that generates diff noise is strongly depricated. the editor
can sort out template induced artifacts.
Patrik Fältström wrote:
> Elisabeth,
>
> Thanks for noticing this difference in how the documents are generated
> from the XML that is in use in the IETF.
>
> The exact order of the sections will be decided upon (and sections
> will potentially be moved around) at the time of publication by the
> RFC Editor while doing other formatting changes.
>
> I have been in contact with the other document editors, and our
> suggestion to our wg chair is to *NOT* risk destroying the actual
> content of the messages by moving things around at the time of last
> call (both wg and IETF).
>
> Regards, Patrik
>
> On 10 aug 2009, at 20.58, Elisabeth Blanconil wrote:
>
>
>> Sorry, I meant that section 8 and author came _after_ the appendixes.
>>
>> Elisabeth Blanconil
>>
>> 2009/8/10 Elisabeth Blanconil <eblanconil at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> 1. is it on purpose that section 8 and author come before the
>>> Appendixes? I restored them in the wiki page.
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idna-update mailing list
>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>
>
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list