KATS (Korean Agency for Technology and Standards)'s Comments on theUnicode Codepoints and IDNA Internet-Draft

JFC Morfin jefsey at jefsey.com
Fri Oct 31 13:26:57 CET 2008


At 12:29 31/10/2008, Michael Everson wrote:
>Martin,
>It's OK to play devil's advocate, but the fact remains that there is
>really no reason why decomposed Hangul should be required for IDN. the
>11K syllables are more than sufficient for all purposes. And the
>Koreans (rightly) are concerned about spoofing. So what is the problem
>with simply permitting the 11K for IDN, and excluding all the rest?

I am sorry to disagree with both.
This should be a decision by zone managers for their zone.
Our job is only to document how to do it and stay coherent with the 
rest of the IDNA.
jfc



More information about the Idna-update mailing list