Consensus Call Tranche 8 Summary - Addendum

Mark Davis mark at macchiato.com
Wed Oct 22 17:36:46 CEST 2008


> If people feel that recommendation
> should be made explicit in the documents somewhere, please
> suggest text and where to put it.

Here's a concrete suggestion.

[In 4.4. Registry Restrictions, after the first paragraph, add:]

Note: In constructing registry policies that disallow historic or technical
characters to reduce opportunities for confusion, some relevant information
may be found at [Unicode-Exclusions] and [Unicode-Security].


[In 12.2. Informative References, add:]

[Unicode-Exclusions]
The Unicode Consortium, "Unicode Standard Annex #31:
Unicode Identifier and Pattern Syntax", March 2008, Section 2.4.
"Specific Character Adjustments", Table 4.
"Candidate Characters for Exclusion from Identifiers", <
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr31/>.

[Unicode-Security]
The
Unicode Consortium, "Unicode Technical Standard #39: Unicode Security
Mechanisms", August 2006, Section 3.1. "General Security Profile for
Identifiers", <
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/>.


Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20081022/70d78d8b/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the Idna-update mailing list