Consensus Call Tranche 8 (Character Adjustments)

[Patrik Fältström]

On 16 okt 2008, at 03.44, Martin Duerst wrote:

>> Understood. Note that if we look at the proposals eszett and the one
>> from korea, the eszett is an exception, while the korean proposal  
>> uses
>> the Unicode properties.
>
> Characterizing the eszett as an exception is correct on one level,
> but in my view, it's only an exception because we took the wrong
> rules for IDNA2003. And these rules are even more wrong for IDNA 2008.

With "exception", I mean "exception" as defined in the tables document  
of IDNA200x.

    Patrik