Consensus Call Tranche 8 (Character Adjustments)

Martin Duerst duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Thu Oct 16 03:16:57 CEST 2008


At 21:39 08/10/15, John C Klensin wrote:
>Marcos,
>
>Thanks for the offer.  Text eagerly awaited -- I've got some
>notes, but I'm sure what you have will be complementary and
>better.
>
>More generally, those two characters have been extensively
>discussed, both on and off-list.  In the case of Eszett (8.a)
>the German orthographic situation is clear and the top-level
>registries who are likely to be most affected understand the
>transition issues (either way) and are willing to deal with
>them.  In the Sigma case, the current registry preference is to
>preserve the IDNA2003 mapping as part of the protocol (see
>forthcoming note).  

As far as I understand, that would be a 180 degrees turn from
the consensus call position that we are just working on, yes?

Regards,   Martin.


>--On Wednesday, 15 October, 2008 07:07 +0200 "Marcos Sanz/Denic"
><sanz at denic.de> wrote:
>
>>> > (8.a) Make Eszett Protocol-Valid per list discussion.
>>> > 
>>> > (8.b) Make Greek final sigma Protocol-Valid per list
>>> > discussion.



#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp     



More information about the Idna-update mailing list