Consensus Call Tranche 3 (Permanence)
William Tan
dready at gmail.com
Wed Oct 15 06:06:17 CEST 2008
> Consensus Call Tranche 3 (Permanence)
> Place your reply here: [YES or NO]
NO
> COMMENTS:
>
On PVALID, the current wording or the ones suggested by Mark or Andrew
is fine with me too.
I agree with Mark and others that the statement about DISALLOWED
characters could be weakened. The need for reclassifying a DISALLOWED
character may arise, and if it does we may well decide to reclassify
it as CONTEXTO rather than PVALID, making it a less detrimental
change.
=wil
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list