Security Considerations: bad split

Vint Cerf vint at google.com
Thu Nov 20 03:44:32 CET 2008


turns out that IETF procedures require security considerations for  
all RFCs.

v

NOTE NEW BUSINESS ADDRESS AND PHONE
Vint Cerf
Google
1818 Library Street, Suite 400
Reston, VA 20190
202-370-5637
vint at google.com




On Nov 19, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Mark Davis wrote:

> Security Considerations
>
> D4. Security Considerations
> R12. Security Considerations
>
> I think it is a really bad idea to split the Security  
> Considerations between Defs and Rationale. There doesn't seem to be  
> any particular reason for the split. They should all be in one  
> place, preferably in Protocol, since that is the core document.
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20081119/bc4cef9a/attachment.htm 


More information about the Idna-update mailing list