Consensus Call Tranche 8 Results

John C Klensin klensin at jck.com
Wed Nov 5 19:15:33 CET 2008



--On Wednesday, 05 November, 2008 18:07 +0100 "Marcos
Sanz/Denic" <sanz at denic.de> wrote:

>> > would a "bundle" approach like that take by CJK work
>> > better? if you register with Esszet you also register with
>> > "ss" and so on?
>> 
>> If required by the standard, so that implementations can
>> depend on it, yes.
> 
> The standard cannot require nor enforce such a thing.

Exactly.

> What it
> can make is  recommendations for registries to follow to avoid
> confusion in the  IDN2003-IDN2008 transition period.

Yes.  See the text in Section 7.2 of the new version of
Rationale as a starting point on text about what those
recommendations might be.

regards,
    john



More information about the Idna-update mailing list