Consensus Call Tranche 8 Results
John C Klensin
klensin at jck.com
Wed Nov 5 19:15:33 CET 2008
--On Wednesday, 05 November, 2008 18:07 +0100 "Marcos
Sanz/Denic" <sanz at denic.de> wrote:
>> > would a "bundle" approach like that take by CJK work
>> > better? if you register with Esszet you also register with
>> > "ss" and so on?
>>
>> If required by the standard, so that implementations can
>> depend on it, yes.
>
> The standard cannot require nor enforce such a thing.
Exactly.
> What it
> can make is recommendations for registries to follow to avoid
> confusion in the IDN2003-IDN2008 transition period.
Yes. See the text in Section 7.2 of the new version of
Rationale as a starting point on text about what those
recommendations might be.
regards,
john
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list