Consensus Call Tranche 8 Results
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Nov 5 10:59:23 CET 2008
If there is no compelling analysis to support another approach,
I would actually support changing the prefix. There are some
advantages in changing the prefix: it becomes clear which version
of the IDNA specifications were used by the encoder. That
information is lost when the same prefix is used by both IDNA2003
and IDNA2008.
That is not changing the prefix, it is adding one. That way one
creates another namespace with a big overlap to an existing one.
Aren't we confused enough already?
jaap
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list