Charter, changes in prefixes, and documentation
John C Klensin
klensin at jck.com
Wed Mar 26 04:22:43 CET 2008
That works for me. Thanks.
john
--On Tuesday, 25 March, 2008 20:13 -0700 Paul Hoffman
<phoffman at imc.org> wrote:
> At 10:20 PM -0400 3/25/08, John C Klensin wrote:
>> --On Tuesday, 25 March, 2008 18:24 -0700 Mark Davis
>> <mark.davis at icu-project.org> wrote:
>>
>>> That works for me. Item (iii) needs fleshing out a bit.
>>>
>>> (iii) A change to the basic approach taken in
>>> the design team documents.
>>>
>>> It is clear when a change would violate (i) or (ii) would
>>> be, but not clear what kind of change would violate (iii).
>>
>> I more or less copied that, with some slight re-wording, from
>> the last version that was posted. I would welcome narrower
>> language, but am also not sure it is necessary.
>
> Given that a few people expressed confusion on that wording,
> it seems necessary. How about:
>
> (iii) A change to the approach in the design team documents (a
> protocol that is independent of Unicode versions, that removes
> any character mapping in the protocol, and has improvements to
> the bidi algorithm).
>
> That does not cover all the changes between IDNA2003 and the
> design team design, (see
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-idna200x-to
> pics-01.txt>), but it covers the high points that could cause
> a charter refresh.
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list