Changing the xn-- prefix
YAO Jiankang
yaojk at cnnic.cn
Tue Mar 25 07:29:11 CET 2008
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrik Fältström" <patrik at frobbit.se>
To: "Shawn Steele" <Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com>
Cc: <idna-update at alvestrand.no>; "John C Klensin" <klensin at jck.com>; "Mark Davis" <mark.davis at icu-project.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: Changing the xn-- prefix
> On 25 mar 2008, at 00.13, Shawn Steele wrote:
>
>> I reread your original mail, and in particular I don't want to get
>> bogged down in the debate of details while trying to set the
>> guidelines, but I'd like to try for "A prefix change MUST be
>> avoided" (removing the condition). If that's going to cause too
>> much randomization, then I'd back down, but the repercussions of
>> changing the prefix are huge.
>
> I am personally in favor of text in the charter that say "The prefix
> xn-- MUST NOT be changed." where MUST NOT is defined according to the
> IETF definition in RFC 2119 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt).
+1
> This put a constrain on the changes the wg is allowed to do to
> IDNA200X (not large so that the prefix has to change) -- at least not
> without rechartering.
>
> Patrik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list