Wwhich RFCs the new work would obsolete, vs update or leave alone

[Patrik Fältström]

On 19 mar 2008, at 14.28, Simon Josefsson wrote:

> If nobody considers StringPrep to be part of IDNA2003, I believe the
> documents should reflect that.

Depends completely of context. RFC 3490 have normative references to  
RFC 3491 and RFC 3454. So it is needed for IDNA2003, and because of  
that "part of idna2003". OTOH, we seems to agree that IDNA200x is only  
to obsolete RFC 3490.

    Patrik