Cf?

[Erik van der Poel]

In the diff that you sent out a little while ago (between 05 and 06c),
U+200C changed from CONTEXTJ to DISALLOWED.

Maybe we just haven't reached consensus on this character, but I
thought most (some?) of us were moving in the direction of allowing
U+200C (in certain contexts).

Erik

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se> wrote:
> Already in category H:
>
>  > 2.2.4. Category H - Require extended special treatment in Lookup and
>  > Resolution
>  >
>  > H: property(cp) is in {Join_Control}
>  >
>  > This category consists of Join Control characters (i.e., they are
>  > not in Category A (Section 2.1.1)) but are still required in IDN
>  > labels under some circumstances.
>
>     Patrik
>
>
>
>  On 18 mar 2008, at 14.49, Erik van der Poel wrote:
>
>  > What about ZWNJ (U+200C)?
>  >
>  > Erik
>  >
>  > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Paul Hoffman <phoffman at imc.org>
>  > wrote:
>  >> At 11:42 PM -0400 3/15/08, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>  >>> Please propose something that I can use for -06.
>  >>
>  >> We can only do that if we know which characters from {Cf}, if any,
>  >> are needed in domain names. Some of the character experts needs to
>  >> chime in here.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> _______________________________________________
>  >> Idna-update mailing list
>  >> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>  >> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>  >>
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Idna-update mailing list
>  > Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>  > http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>