IDNA applications (was: RE: sharp s (Eszett))
Paul Hoffman
phoffman at imc.org
Fri Mar 7 23:19:12 CET 2008
At 4:45 PM -0500 3/7/08, John C Klensin wrote:
>--On Friday, 07 March, 2008 13:03 -0800 Paul Hoffman
><phoffman at imc.org> wrote:
>
>> Just to be clear: this is not just browsers. All applications
>> that use IDNA2003 (mail programs, IM clients, and so on) will
>> need to have the self-update property described above,
>> assuming that we adopt the "mapping is done in the
>> application" idea.
>
>Paul,
>
>One needs this even without the "mapping is done in the
>application" rule.
>
>What requires it is getting rid of the rule that unassigned code
>points are looked up.
This goes back to a comment you made earlier today about the way I
stated "(a)". I said:
a) Update base character set from Unicode 3.2 to Unicode 5.0 or 5.1
You said:
a) Update base character set from Unicode 3.2 to Unicode version-agnostic
Those two are quite different statements, and the group needs to
decide which, if either, it wants to achieve.
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list