3492bis

Paul Hoffman phoffman at imc.org
Thu Jun 19 03:43:50 CEST 2008


At 3:17 AM +0200 6/19/08, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>There are two or more interoperable implementations, it
>only takes an implementation and interop report, and a
>new "PubReq" proposing DS.  What do you think about it ?

Given that almost no one cares about Draft Standard vs. Proposed 
Standard (is anyone really not going to implement IDNs because of the 
status), I would prefer to focus on the IDNA2008 documents. This 
seems more like bookkeeping.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list