Issues list for draft-ietf-idnabis-tables document
Patrik Fältström
patrik at frobbit.se
Mon Jul 14 10:28:15 CEST 2008
This is the current list of issues that are outstanding. The rest of
the issues SHOULD have been taken care of by version -02.txt that
should be available shortly in the repositories.
P1: Order of codepoints in for example the exceptions table
Current state: Order is by codepoint value
Proposal: Sort by value instead of code point, for clarity. Ideally
each value would be in its own subsection: PVALID,
CONTEXTO,...
Comment from editor: I have seen more voices against this proposal
than in favor.
Suggested action: None
P2: Split appendix A (non-normative list of codepoints) in one list
per property value
Current state: The list is not split
Proposal: Split the list in one per property value, or at least order
by property value.
Comment from editor: I suggested this after seeing [P1]. Voices where
rised against this proposal.
Suggested action: None
P3: IANA is to update the Backward Compatible list.
Current State: IANA is to host a list of derived values such as the
one in appendix A, and update this list whenever a new version of
Unicode is published. IANA is not to update any of the tables in this
document. That is done only by updating this RFC.
Proposal: Have the backwards compatible character list, the exceptions
list, and the context rules all be in a single document published by
IANA, and controlled by the group discussed in rationale.
Comment from editor: Most voices want changes to this document be by
updating it, i.e. by requiring IESG action.
Suggested action: None
P4: Remove Appendix A
Current state: Appendix A holds a non-normative table of derived
property values for Unicode 5.1.
Proposal: Remove the appendix as developers and readers do not
understand the difference between the appendix being normative or non-
normative.
Comment from editor: At least during development of this I-D, the
appendix has helped. I also think personally people do understand the
difference. So I personally am not as worried.
Suggested action: None
Patrik
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list