more fixes for Tables

[Patrik Fältström]

Note that the table is not normative. People should not refer to it.

Ill have a look at it.

    Patrik

On 9 feb 2008, at 16.57, "Erik van der Poel" <erikv at google.com> wrote:

> Patrik,
>
> Regarding tables-04:
>
> F: cp in {00B7, 02B9, 0375, 0483, 05F3, 05F4, 3007, 303B, 30FB}
>
> This is missing 002D and 3005. Maybe you should just remove this line
> and tell readers to look at the table. Then you don't have to remember
> to keep the two in sync.
>
> Also, the draft says:
>
> E: cp is in {002D, 0030..0039, 0061..007A}
>
> However, in the appendix it says:
>
> 0041..005A  ; PVALID
>
> And the appendix says:
>
> 01D5..01DC  ; DISALLOWED
>
> However, 01D6 has a canonical decomposition (not a compatibility one),
> so toNFKC does not change it, and 01D6 is not changed by toCasefolding
> either.
>
> How would you like to proceed? If you would like to fix your script,
> please send me the new output privately, and I will run another diff.
>
> Erik