Tables: BackwardCompatible Maintanence

[Patrik Fältström]

On 10 dec 2008, at 03.25, Erik van der Poel wrote:

> I believe the point is that *if* a relevant Unicode property changes,
> no matter how unlikely, then the IETF and other DNS stakeholders ought
> to get a chance to consider whether or not to make the consequent
> incompatible change to IDNA.

Thanks, this is my point. At least the _first_ time this happens. When  
the RFC is updated because of this, the first time, THEN we can have  
this discussion (again) and relax the rule and say that the update of  
list G Backward Compatible is automatic.

    Patrik