Mapping other Digits to 0-9
Patrik Fältström
patrik at frobbit.se
Tue Dec 9 13:04:19 CET 2008
On 5 dec 2008, at 20.50, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:26:32AM -0800, Shawn Steele wrote:
>
>> That's fine, but then I'm confused about what the discussion of the
>> Arabic digits is? Is it just to disallow Arabic digits?
>> (Disallowing them implies to me that someone would map them.) In
>> either case this isn't just Arabic digits, we allow mapping of
>> digits for other scripts as well.
>
> No, I believe what we are discussing is adding a context rule to the
> protocol that says, "If a label contains a code point in $somerange,
> it must not also contain any code point for $otherrange." The
> discussion is (1) whether to add this at all and (2) if adding it is
> ok, what the values of $somerange and $otherrange should be.
Correct Andrew.
From tables-04:
Appendix A.15. EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGITS
[[extended-indic-digit: Example of contextual rule for Extended
Indic
Digits. --paf]]
Code point:
06F0..06F9
Overview:
Can not be mixed with Arabic-Indic Digits.
Lookup:
False
Rule Set:
True;
For All Characters:
If cp .in. 0660..0669 Then False;
End For;
Patrik
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list