Protocol-08 (and status of Defs-04 and Rationale-06)

[Harald Alvestrand]

Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>>           
>> Alright, that is what has been proposed so far. *But* we now need
>> to take into account Harald's reminder that some combinations
>> are already disallowed separately by the bidi rules on label
>> well-formedness, quite independently of any consideration of
>> CONTEXTO categorization. What the bidi rules require of label
>> formation is:
>>
>> Bidi:     Forbid (d) and (f) [and (g) by corollary]. Allow (e).
>>   
>>     
>
> Could you point out the lines in bidi you are referring to here?
>
>   
Section 2 rule 5:

   5.  If an EN is present, no AN may be present, and vice versa.


                      Harald