Reserved general punctuation

Patrik Fältström patrik at
Wed Apr 30 12:08:34 CEST 2008

On 28 apr 2008, at 16.21, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> I'm not suggesting changing the defined marks; just making  
> 2064..2069 UNASSIGNED.

One view could be that as the block 2065..2069 is defined as  
Other_Default_Ignorable_Code_Point, why would it not be DISALLOWED?  
Because when the codepoint is assigned, this might change?

Another view that all unassigned codepoints (as defined by not being  
defined in UnicodeData.txt) are UNASSIGNED.

What do you all on this list want? Today we are implementing the first.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list