Determining the basic approach

JFC Morfin jefsey at
Wed Apr 30 03:21:10 CEST 2008

At 19:20 29/04/2008, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>Greetings again. According to our charter, one of the first tasks of 
>this WG is to determine whether we are going to make "a change to 
>the basic approach taken in the design team documents". To that end, 
>I have circulated a few versions of a draft that lists all of the 
>basic approaches embodied in the current design team documents:
>In order to make our deadlines (and I really like Patrik's 
>suggestion in his most recent document that we call this effort 
>IDNA2008 so we try to meet that goal), we should start that 
>discussion sooner rather than later.
>Using the draft's numbering of topics that are different between 
>IDNA2003 and the design team documents,
>I support the WG adopting: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10,
>I am neutral on the WG adopting: 8, 9
>I am against the WG adopting: 11, a, b

I plan maintaining a table on for an easy perusal 
of the answsers (or copy yours if you plan maintaining it).

I support the WG adopting 1, 2, 8, 9

I am neutral on the WG adopting  3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, a

I am against the WG adopting 11, b


More information about the Idna-update mailing list