Determining the basic approach
JFC Morfin
jefsey at jefsey.com
Wed Apr 30 03:21:10 CEST 2008
At 19:20 29/04/2008, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>Greetings again. According to our charter, one of the first tasks of
>this WG is to determine whether we are going to make "a change to
>the basic approach taken in the design team documents". To that end,
>I have circulated a few versions of a draft that lists all of the
>basic approaches embodied in the current design team documents:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-idna200x-topics-03.txt
>
>In order to make our deadlines (and I really like Patrik's
>suggestion in his most recent document that we call this effort
>IDNA2008 so we try to meet that goal), we should start that
>discussion sooner rather than later.
>
>Using the draft's numbering of topics that are different between
>IDNA2003 and the design team documents,
>
>I support the WG adopting: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10,
>
>I am neutral on the WG adopting: 8, 9
>
>I am against the WG adopting: 11, a, b
I plan maintaining a table on http://wikidna.org for an easy perusal
of the answsers (or copy yours if you plan maintaining it).
I support the WG adopting 1, 2, 8, 9
I am neutral on the WG adopting 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, a
I am against the WG adopting 11, b
jfc
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list