WG Review: Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (Revised) (idnabis)

[Patrik Fältström]

FWIW: Me too. I think it was the right thing to do, but I think we NOW  
can get version independence.

    Patrik

On 9 apr 2008, at 17.17, Vint Cerf wrote:

> i find myself in the second group at the present.
>
> v
>
> On Apr 9, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
>> At 5:15 PM -0400 4/8/08, Vint Cerf wrote:
>>> It is believed that the first attempt in 2003 did not adequately  
>>> deal with several key issues including Unicode version-independence.
>>
>> IDNA2003 was not supposed to deal with version-independence. Just  
>> the opposite: we explicitly chose to be version-dependent. Some of  
>> us think that was still the correct thing to do. Some of us also  
>> think that version-independence would be fine.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idna-update mailing list
>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update