WG Review: Internationalized Domain Names in Applications
phoffman at imc.org
Wed Apr 9 17:12:42 CEST 2008
At 5:15 PM -0400 4/8/08, Vint Cerf wrote:
>It is believed that the first attempt in 2003 did not adequately
>deal with several key issues including Unicode version-independence.
IDNA2003 was not supposed to deal with version-independence. Just the
opposite: we explicitly chose to be version-dependent. Some of us
think that was still the correct thing to do. Some of us also think
that version-independence would be fine.
More information about the Idna-update