IDNAbis documents

[Mark Davis]

I'm glad you sent this out, since I had no idea that they had been posted.

Mark

On Nov 24, 2007 1:50 PM, John C Klensin <klensin at jck.com> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Paul Hoffman just pointed out to me that, while I sent the
> announcement that follows to the apps-discuss list, I apparently
> forgot to send it to this list.   My apologies.
>
> By now, draft-klensin-idnabis-issues-05 and
> draft-klensin-idnabis-protocol-02 have been posted.  They differ
> from the immediately previous versions only in having some
> terminology changed (the "always" category was called "yes" in
> the previous drafts) to match the terminology of the
> newly-posted draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-03.  The two news
> sets of "issues" and "protocol" documents differ from the
> versions announced below by a _lot_ of editorial work.
>
>    john
>
> ------------ Forwarded Message ------------
> Date: Friday, November 02, 2007 3:24 PM -0400
> From: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>
> To: discuss at apps.ietf.org
> Subject: IDNAbis documents
>
> Hi.
>
> Two new documents, draft-klensin-idnabis-issues-03 and
> draft-klensin-idnabis-protocol-00 have been posted  The first
> has been announced, the second should follow soon.
>
> These are the first versions of the IDNAbis document set that
> separate the protocol specification from the theory and
> rationale.   I suggest that anyone interested in IDNA examine
> them as closely as possible.
>
>     john
>
> ---------- End Forwarded Message ----------
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>



-- 
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20071124/b0e54eec/attachment.html