New version, draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available

[Patrik Fältström]

On 20 jun 2007, at 00.46, Kenneth Whistler wrote:

> Appropriate for inclusion.

To make my (as editor of the document) life easier, when going  
through codepoint examples, can people (not only you Ken, do not take  
this personally please) use terminology that maps directly to the  
tables document?

For example, I presume you with "Appropriate for inclusion" imply  
that it is Appropriate with property value ALWAYS"?

And when you say "All of the CJK and Kangxi radicals are  
inappropriate for IDN's
because of their general category gc=So." you say "it is ok for all  
CJK and Kangxi radicals to be in NEVER as they do not match rule A  
(gc=So)".

I.e. I need to understand when you find bugs in the rule set, and  
when you prove the rules are correct. And I appreciate all help in  
doing that matching while you discuss.

    Patrik