New version, draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available

Debbie Garside debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Tue Jun 19 13:14:50 CEST 2007


Hi Vint

Thanks.  I'm reading the rules now.  It may take me a while :-)

Best regards

Debbie 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vint Cerf [mailto:vint at google.com] 
> Sent: 19 June 2007 11:45
> To: 'Debbie Garside'; patrik at frobbit.se; 'Martin Duerst'
> Cc: 'Harald Alvestrand'; 'Gervase Markham'; idna-update at alvestrand.no
> Subject: RE: New version, 
> draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available
> 
> Debbie,
> 
> By inference from Patrik's email, these would be scripts that 
> have characters whose properties have placed them in the 
> ALWAYS category which have an extremely low to zero 
> probability of being moved later into the NEVER category. 
> 
> Vint
>  
> 
> 
> Vinton G Cerf
> Chief Internet Evangelist
> Google
> Regus Suite 384
> 13800 Coppermine Road
> Herndon, VA 20171
>  
> +1 703 234-1823
> +1 703-234-5822 (f)
>  
> vint at google.com
> www.google.com
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Debbie Garside
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 5:17 AM
> To: patrik at frobbit.se; 'Martin Duerst'
> Cc: 'Harald Alvestrand'; 'Gervase Markham'; idna-update at alvestrand.no
> Subject: RE: New version, 
> draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available
> 
> Patrik wrote:
> 
> > Now give me names of other scripts that are as stable.
> 
> Can you define stable please?
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Debbie
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no 
> > [mailto:idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Patrik 
> > Fältström
> > Sent: 19 June 2007 08:48
> > To: Martin Duerst
> > Cc: Harald Alvestrand; Gervase Markham; idna-update at alvestrand.no
> > Subject: Re: New version,
> > draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available
> > 
> > 
> > On 19 jun 2007, at 04.45, Martin Duerst wrote:
> > 
> > > So you want somebody to say that there will be no more bugs
> > in script
> > > X, and then you can add script X to the list? And you 
> want to base 
> > > this on past number of bugs? Which way? If a lot of bugs 
> have been 
> > > found, that may be an indication that there are not too many more 
> > > left. Or, if a lot of bugs have been found, that may be an
> > indication
> > > of more benig hidden.
> > 
> > I want someone to say what scripts they want there. I have together 
> > with some people added Greek, Latin and Cyrillic. I have so far not 
> > heard any other suggestions.
> > 
> > I think Harald (specifically, he even came up with a suggested use
> > policy) and also John and also me, in different words, said 
> that what 
> > we (all of us, including you) do NOT want to happen is that 
> something 
> > that have ALWAYS end up getting the NEVER derived value. Or 
> at least 
> > minimize that risk. Moving things from ALWAYS to NEVER will 
> definitely 
> > create a situation where already registered domain names 
> are no longer 
> > valid. Etc etc.
> > 
> > Of course it MIGHT happen. Also with latin, greek and 
> cyrillic. But I 
> > personally see that risk very very very very small. Enough to have 
> > latin, greek and cyrillic there.
> > 
> > Now give me names of other scripts that are as stable.
> > 
> >     Patrik
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Idna-update mailing list
> > Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> > http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
> 
> 
> 





More information about the Idna-update mailing list