Moving Right Along on the Inclusions Table...

Mark Davis mark.davis at icu-project.org
Wed Dec 20 18:12:35 CET 2006


I've linked to it on several occasions:
http://www.unicode.org/review/pr-96.html

While it is not completely settled -- it is out for review now and you can
see the questions we are asking -- I don't see a problem with it progressing
to the point where we can use it by the time the other work we are doing is
ready.

Mark

On 12/20/06, Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no> wrote:
>
> Mark Davis wrote:
> > Those are all reasonable changes.
> >
> >     * We should also add the Joiner/NonJoiner. They would however, as
> >       discussed, be restricted to very specific contexts by additional
> >       clauses (like the current bidi restrictions).
> >
> Mark, can you take a stab at writing down those rules?
> I have seen you referred to this as a "solved problem" a couple of
> times, but I haven't seen a specific algorithm proposed yet.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20061220/776dfed6/attachment.html


More information about the Idna-update mailing list