Return-Path: Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.2.8-Mandrake-RPM-2.2.8-4.2.101mdk) with LMTPA; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:59:59 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBAE3200A9 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 16:59:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01886-06 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 16:59:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.4.8 Received: from montage.altserver.com (montage.altserver.com [63.247.74.122]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C0132009F for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 16:59:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ver78-2-82-241-91-24.fbx.proxad.net ([82.241.91.24] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1EBD1U-0003Qu-9Q; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 08:00:08 -0700 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20050902160537.04d5dd30@mail.jefsey.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 17:00:03 +0200 To: Iljitsch van Beijnum , Harald Tveit Alvestrand From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" Subject: Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...) Cc: IETF General Discussion Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <431676B7.5040302@cs.utk.edu> <8A8B241D9FAA21D02F463B3F@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - alvestrand.no X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no At 20:30 01/09/2005, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: >Here's a philosophical question for you: is it right to force a >philosophy on people? Dear Iljitsch, I started that debate with Harald in 2000 at the DNSO/GA over the understanding of "global". This mares many issues. Harald says "yes", I say "no", but I understand the need of "yes" on occasions, when the users want it and for transitions. Like in the Roman constitution. Why not once for all gather all the cons and pros and call for an IAB guidance to get documented if the Internet is a directive system or not, or can be distinctly both, at the same time, or at distinct times. I think it can be both if the concerned areas are clearly defined. For example, could classes help in this case to create a real but crossable boarder? I don't know, just an hint to address the security concern. jfc