Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20050829232615.053d5eb0@mail.jefsey.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:53:54 +0200
To: Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com
From: r&d afrac <rd@afrac.org>
In-Reply-To: <OF0AD5DB36.AD5812E4-ON8825706C.006DF80D-8825706C.006EFE1C@
	spe.sony.com>
References: <OF0AD5DB36.AD5812E4-ON8825706C.006DF80D-8825706C.006EFE1C@spe.sony.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Communication protocols
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0001833957=="
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

--===============0001833957==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="=====================_2624083==.ALT"

--=====================_2624083==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 22:09 29/08/2005, Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com wrote:
>Jefsey,
>As I am reading through my in-box on this subject, I see you have 
>used no less than three different e-mail addresses and identities on 
>the LTRU list today. It would be of great assistance to all if you 
>could decide on a single personality to use to represent yourself 
>within this group -- if that is an acceptable cultural imposition.

Dear Karen,
I apologise for the inconvenience (I suppose you classify the 
incoming mails per authors?). The reason why of two is that my IETF 
mailname is jefsey@jefsey.com (my regular mail) and that when I was 
banned from this list this rose the interest of my working group, and 
my AFRAC name was used, this stayed - I am not the only one accessing 
the mails. During the last call period there are mails copied to ietf 
and to ltru and this creates a problem, probably obliging Randy to 
accept the two names (thank you for that).

I was not aware I used a third one (as a consultant and a searcher I 
am involved in more than thirty activities and projects, with various 
assistant/teams calling for a dedicated password): this was a mistake.

I will take advantage from your remark. It shows that common mail 
behaviour (I am using e-mail for management purposes for 28 years, so 
one grow accustomed to various habits ...) leads people to have 
various avatars, and that each of these avatars has a dedicated 
organisation and context. (as you noted I am not the only one). This 
is related to languages because each avatar has different relational 
parameters (for example signature: I suppose that you do not use your 
spe.sony.com for personal relations) and can also have various 
langtags.  This certainly add to the complexity of tagging.

This kind of errors, for the organisation of a mailing list, could be 
addressed through a dedicated OPES. Which also could address langtags 
related issues and services. And interfacte ISO 11179 compliant 
registries, etc. I will not continue :-)

Take care
jfc








>Karen Broome
>Metadata Systems Designer
>Sony Pictures Entertainment
>310.244.4384

--=====================_2624083==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<body>
At 22:09 29/08/2005, Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font size=2>Jefsey,</font>
<br>
<font size=2>As I am reading through my in-box on this subject, I see you
have used no less than three different e-mail addresses and identities on
the LTRU list today. It would be of great assistance to all if you could
decide on a single personality to use to represent yourself within this
group -- if that is an acceptable cultural imposition.
</font></blockquote><br>
Dear Karen,<br>
I apologise for the inconvenience (I suppose you classify the incoming
mails per authors?). The reason why of two is that my IETF mailname is
jefsey@jefsey.com (my regular mail) and that when I was banned from this
list this rose the interest of my working group, and my AFRAC name was
used, this stayed - I am not the only one accessing the mails. During the
last call period there are mails copied to ietf and to ltru and this
creates a problem, probably obliging Randy to accept the two names (thank
you for that). <br><br>
I was not aware I used a third one (as a consultant and a searcher I am
involved in more than thirty activities and projects, with various
assistant/teams calling for a dedicated password): this was a
mistake.<br><br>
I will take advantage from your remark. It shows that common mail
behaviour (I am using e-mail for management purposes for 28 years, so one
grow accustomed to various habits ...) leads people to have various
avatars, and that each of these avatars has a dedicated organisation and
context. (as you noted I am not the only one). This is related to
languages because each avatar has different relational parameters (for
example signature: I suppose that you do not use your spe.sony.com for
personal relations) and can also have various langtags.&nbsp; This
certainly add to the complexity of tagging.<br><br>
This kind of errors, for the organisation of a mailing list, could be
addressed through a dedicated OPES. Which also could address langtags
related issues and services. And interfacte ISO 11179 compliant
registries, etc. I will not continue :-)<br><br>
Take care<br>
jfc<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font size=2>Karen Broome<br>
Metadata Systems Designer<br>
Sony Pictures Entertainment<br>
310.244.4384</font> <br>
</blockquote></body>
</html>

--=====================_2624083==.ALT--



--===============0001833957==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

--===============0001833957==--