Return-Path: Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.1.11-Mandrake-RPM-2.1.11-1mdk) with LMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:49 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F0061BD5; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04534-05; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FA261BED; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:44 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AB961BD5 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04534-02 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from pechora.icann.org (pechora.icann.org [192.0.34.35]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53EC61BB0 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from montage.altserver.com (montage.altserver.com [63.247.74.122]) by pechora.icann.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0HHYjA20561 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:34:45 -0800 Received: from lns-p19-1-idf-82-251-91-4.adsl.proxad.net ([82.251.91.4] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Cqamu-0007sf-4H; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:35:36 -0800 Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050117180220.0525c010@mail.jefsey.com> X-Sender: jefsey+jefsey.com@mail.jefsey.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:35:02 +0100 To: "Jon Hanna" , From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" In-Reply-To: <20050117160537.54E915BE3CDE@postie2.hosting365.ie> References: <6.1.2.0.2.20050117125306.048dcbd0@mail.jefsey.com> <20050117160537.54E915BE3CDE@postie2.hosting365.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-3D417088 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - iana.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no Cc: Subject: RE: language tag structure X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no Errors-To: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no At 17:05 17/01/2005, Jon Hanna wrote: >I want to indicate the way the text is written - like in > > "handwriting". > >How about indicating whether the handwriting is done by someone in a good >mood or not, and whether they're taking pains or scribbling quickly. After >all I'm sure someone needs it! Probably less than knowing if the writer had one paint or two, Harp or Guinness, etc. Teasing apart: banking and security control. PDAs, morphing, languages with no printed scripts. optical reading, etc. But here I was referring to my use of "ing" in my "scripting" usage, when trying to convey an added value in copying the word "handwriting". Peter Constable understood it well. Now, your teasing, reminds me a discussion in 1984 about the compared merits of the dumb X.121 ISO scheme - with its permitted 32 digits - and the brilliant IPv4 4 digits addressing schemes. No one would ever need more than 4 digits numbers organized in blocks so well !!! 32 hexa are 128 bits. Which make the /128 IPv6 block. After all I'm someone needs it, actually I am sure someone needs much more today: something named openness and innovation capacity. Anyway, I therefore take that you have no addition and no compatibility problem. Accepted. Thank you. jfc _______________________________________________ Ietf-languages mailing list Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages