Return-Path: Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.1.11-Mandrake-RPM-2.1.11-1mdk) with LMTP; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:47:29 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0895E61B8D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 02:47:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17522-06 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 02:47:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from montage.altserver.com (montage.altserver.com [63.247.74.122]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C082E61AD5 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 02:47:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from lns-p19-19-idf-82-249-7-129.adsl.proxad.net ([82.249.7.129] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Cn5hJ-0004lV-Tz; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:47:22 -0800 Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050107231111.0cf70590@mail.jefsey.com> X-Sender: jefsey+jefsey.com@mail.jefsey.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:21:08 +0100 To: Ted Hardie , Tom Petch , "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" , From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" Subject: Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no. In-Reply-To: References: <200516104826.996163@bbprime> <065e01c4f4db$b2313140$0601a8c0@pc6> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-40C4E61 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - alvestrand.no X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no Dear Ted, the experience of this Last Call shown the problem comes from the diversity of the internet. You may feel that a proposed solution is minor in your area and not realize that it has a big impact in others areas. This is why WGs are important: their Charters are the only place for some kind of coordination of the internet architecture. Otherwise the only time for concerned areas to exchange is the Last Call. Too late. jfc