Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050103123714.02773280@mail.club-internet.fr>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:27:13 +0100
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
From: "J-F C. (Jefsey)  Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
Subject: [ga] Re: Is there still a GNSO?
Cc: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@gnso.icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050103102709.GA750@nic.fr>
References: <001901c4edf3$378bc840$4d34fd3e@richard>
 <6.1.2.0.2.20050102134749.03715eb0@mail.club-internet.fr>
 <20050103102709.GA750@nic.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-E797048
Sender: owner-ga@gnso.icann.org
Precedence: bulk

At 11:27 03/01/2005, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 02:51:14PM +0100,
>  J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@club-internet.fr> wrote
>  a message of 6 lines which said:
>
> > I am interested to know if there is still a GNSO/GA or any other
> > GNSO entity alive?
>
>It does not seem so.
>
> > We may be on the verge of major users lead changes in naming and
> > possibly in addressing and even in architecture.Will this mailing
> > list want to investigate, support or lead this move? or stay a one
> > no interest mail a month list?
>
>The least you can say is that it is very difficult to have an open
>forum for *all* Internet users. Such forums are very quickly
>overwhelmed by people like Jeff W. or Joe B. or Jim F. and the
>interesting people quickly move out.
>
>Sadly, I do not think you can discuss Internet governance in a
>completely open structure at the present time.

I know ... but this may be a way for us the users to show the inability of 
ICANN to address their concerns and their evolution.
jfc