Return-Path: Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.2.8-Mandrake-RPM-2.2.8-4.2.101mdk) with LMTPA; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:39:01 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2783861B05 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 22:39:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07556-05 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 22:38:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.4.8 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7753F61B03 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 22:38:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dqzbz-0005qc-7a; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:38:15 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dqzbx-0005nL-V3 for ltru@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:38:13 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA26340 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 16:38:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from montage.altserver.com ([63.247.74.122]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dr03P-00025T-Vh for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:06:36 -0400 Received: from ver78-2-82-241-91-24.fbx.proxad.net ([82.241.91.24] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1DqzbM-0005Z3-Vb; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:37:37 -0700 Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050708221842.04e3feb0@mail.afrac.org> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:37:16 +0200 To: "Randy Presuhn" , From: r&d afrac Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1058] Referencing the tagging scheme In-Reply-To: <005001c583f3$49a0e560$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> References: <005001c583f3$49a0e560$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - afrac.org X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f Cc: X-BeenThere: ltru@lists.ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org Errors-To: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at alvestrand.no At 21:28 08/07/2005, Randy Presuhn wrote: >Hi - >Ok, I think we've gone from a weak "accept" to a rough consensus >to reject this proposal. I've updated the ticket accordingly. > >If you think there is value in further discussion, please include the issue >number in the subject line. For my own culture, I would be interested in understanding what are your criteria for rough consensus. My reading of this question is that practical observation makes a kind of referencing de facto built-in in usage? It would be better to document how - this is related to updates, dates, etc. But it might call for a revamp of the document structure. So I agree that we drop the matter. But "reject" may discourage futher more interesting ideas. I liked the Kentucky press and their tagging system. Anyway, it is your show. Let it be your way. jfc _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru