Return-Path: Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.2.8-Mandrake-RPM-2.2.8-4.2.101mdk) with LMTPA; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:32:16 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A832361B45 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:32:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30042-02 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FE661AF1 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DGD3v-0006mC-GD; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:31:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DGD3r-0006kG-R5 for ltru@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:30:59 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA06811 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:30:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from [63.247.76.194] (helo=montage.altserver.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DGDAW-0005Zz-Up for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:37:54 -0500 Received: from lns-p19-8-idf-82-65-71-22.adsl.proxad.net ([82.65.71.22] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1DGD3o-0001Hd-Pu; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:30:57 -0800 Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050329095430.047d6a80@mail.jefsey.com> X-Sender: jefsey+jefsey.com@mail.jefsey.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:31:14 +0200 To: "Doug Ewell" , "LTRU Working Group" From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Shelf life of data In-Reply-To: <00ac01c5340e$8697a9c0$030aa8c0@DEWELL> References: <634978A7DF025A40BFEF33EB191E13BC0AC2A1CB@irvmbxw01.quest.com> <6.1.2.0.2.20050328174831.03778c00@mail.jefsey.com> <00ac01c5340e$8697a9c0$030aa8c0@DEWELL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com X-Scan-Signature: 4adaf050708fb13be3316a9eee889caa Cc: X-BeenThere: ltru@lists.ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org Errors-To: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at alvestrand.no At 05:22 29/03/2005, Doug Ewell wrote: > > We started using alpha-3 by mid-77 and formalized it in oct 1978 > > (Mike Rude); and alpha-2 in 1981. Earlier entries are probably not > > necessary, unless for archives, historics and experience/testing. > >I'm not sure who "we" is in this case, but ISO 3166 has always had >alpha-2 codes since its debut in 1974, and language tags under RFC 1766 >and 3066 have always used them, never the alpha-3 country codes. "We" is the world at large. Started in Feb. 1971 as a private service and became FCC licensed, ITU sponsored common understanding/agreements by monopolies in 77. History is interesting when it can teach for the future. I think this is what is happening with Multilingual Internet, of which langtags are the very first step. 1. It started using alpha-3 codes for public monopolies, plus US International Record Carriers logos (ITT, WUI, etc.). 2 letters codes were accepted for refilers (telex operators refilling traffic into the packet switch network as did the Internet communities further on). They were just cut and pasted for ARPANET ccTLD (RFC 920). 2. IRT languages. First tests of language support were with French, German, etc. languages in 76/78 then more seriously with 82/83 with EEC and ESA and non Latin with Kokusai Tymshare and KDD. C&W had some effort made in 84/85 with Chinese test services in HK. Tests with French and German Videotex were without problem in 84/86. Israeli had something in Hebrew at their Chief Scientist office in 1985. Arabic was also tested at that time by Egyptian PTT. OTE in Athens shown me a rudimentary service, probably in 1985. EBCDIC code was supported from the very beginning but not permitted for a long and abandoned when OSI started being supported. 3. For consistency with these past archives we should include all the past codes in the first base, so this is settled once for all. On-Line public documents started with NLM Bethesda. Then there were quick development by Dialog, Lockheed and a few other large US information services and the Diane members in Europe. They were mostly in American, English and French (France and Canada). It is fun, when you stabilize something to be able to support everything down to its very roots. But also, it provides more occasions to test the way the adopted solution stands table changes. BTW IRT ISO 3166-3 we will have a copyright problem that has to be addressed in the Draft. jfc _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru