Return-Path: Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.2.8-Mandrake-RPM-2.2.8-4.2.101mdk) with LMTPA; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:01:03 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35E961B4C for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:01:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31642-04 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:00:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31B461B49 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:00:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DETlW-0001pm-Iq; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:56:54 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DETlU-0001pY-QF for ltru@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:56:52 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA18722 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:56:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from [63.247.76.194] (helo=montage.altserver.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DETrB-0005vJ-NQ for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:02:46 -0500 Received: from lns-p19-19-idf-82-65-128-79.adsl.proxad.net ([82.65.128.79] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1DETlR-0002B2-Ty; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 06:56:51 -0800 Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050324152634.040b78a0@mail.jefsey.com> X-Sender: jefsey+jefsey.com@mail.jefsey.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:50:13 +0100 To: John Cowan From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" Subject: Re: [Ltru] is there some wiskey in the jar - [was: Registry in record-jar format] In-Reply-To: <20050324135428.GA16394@skunk.reutershealth.com> References: <634978A7DF025A40BFEF33EB191E13BC0AB82B68@irvmbxw01.quest.com> <42425B3B.12DA@xyzzy.claranet.de> <6.1.2.0.2.20050324080839.0406a570@mail.jefsey.com> <20050324135428.GA16394@skunk.reutershealth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336 Cc: ltru@ietf.org X-BeenThere: ltru@lists.ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org Errors-To: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at alvestrand.no At 14:54 24/03/2005, John Cowan wrote: >JFC (Jefsey) Morfin scripsit: > > I suppose that the total > > amount of registrations may be in the range of 30-100.000. > >The number of potential tags far exceeds that already. The number of >useful tags is rather less. I rise a question, I do not dispute anything. Can you quantify/qualify what is useful? >But in any case, the whole point of >RFC 3066bis is to register only tag parts (and in 99% of cases directly >tracking the various ISO standards). So, what is the need for any registration? > > Plus private > > registration - over the years this may amount to millions if SNHNs start > > playing the way every indication show they will. > >What are these "indications" You are welcome to work on this yourself. You will certainly better document them than I could. > > I note also that for such a standardized and hopefully stable formatted > > system, the format can certainly be prototyped in using XML but a more > > compact solution should to be considered. Most probably UDP supported. > >Nobody supposes that the tag registry must or should be retrieved in >real time as the DNS is. Caching, lots of private caching, is the >order of the day, and it is already going on. I am extremely interested if you could document these IANA caching mechanisms. Distributed IANA is precisely what we (AFRAC) work on as a protoype Context Reference Center. > > I do not know why but I feel we are considering a gas refinery where a > > straw would be enough to sip the wiskey in the -jar. > >The straw in question is the strawman argument you are making. Oh! no problem: I am then a strawman for a few 30 years :-) jfc _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru