Return-Path: Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.1.11-Mandrake-RPM-2.1.11-1mdk) with LMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:26:20 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C2761BB4 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:26:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08621-10 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:26:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D3761BAD for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:26:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D7ZF7-0006nu-IG; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:22:53 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D7ZF5-0006np-6p for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:22:51 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA13104 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:22:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from [63.247.76.195] (helo=montage.altserver.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D7ZGq-0002C4-LB for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:24:41 -0500 Received: from lns-p19-19-idf-82-249-7-203.adsl.proxad.net ([82.249.7.203] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1D7ZEr-0001ad-4i for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 05:22:37 -0800 Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050305140700.0529cc60@mail.jefsey.com> X-Sender: jefsey+jefsey.com@mail.jefsey.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:22:30 +0100 To: ietf@ietf.org From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" In-Reply-To: <748F18B30D828F71B6EF06D3@scan.jck.com> References: <01LLI6WN3H8O00005R@mauve.mrochek.com> <200503042335.38093.blilly@erols.com> <748F18B30D828F71B6EF06D3@scan.jck.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370 Subject: Discussing Draft Netiquette X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF-Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no Would there be an objection that netiquette calls to quote the Draft's URL when discussing a Draft, as when quoting and discussing any other document? The time wasted in finding discussed Drafts (and actually discussed version) probably make interest in them to drop and comments to be lost or never proposed. Last Call: 'Message Submission' to Draft Standard ... Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-assumptions-02.txt 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At ... are among the last drafts I would have been interested to review after some of the coments. If one cannot easily compare a comment with the proposed text, what is the interest of the text and of the comment? jfc _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf